Anti-Sola Scriptura Arguments Refuted:
"David
A. Barrett's book, World Christian Encyclopedia, says that there are
30,000 denominations that use sola Scriptura. Obviously using the Bible only
doesn't work, we need tradition, since there is only one Catholic church!"
TRUTH: Any Traditionalist who misuses David Barrett's data in this way is either dishonest or ignorant. Barrett's data leads us to conclude that there are in fact 30 Roman Catholic denominations and 41 different Orthodox denominations and only 27 "Protestant" denominations and 185 "Independent" denominations. Obviously then, using tradition is not the answer. Further, very few churches in the world actually use sola Scriptura!
|
|
Sola Scriptura proven from the Bible! |
|
More
Anti-Sola Scriptura arguments refuted! |
|
|
|
"There are 30,000 denominations that use sola Scriptura. Obviously using the Bible only doesn't work, we need tradition!"
"Sola Scriptura leads to doctrinal anarchy, which is further reason why you need an infallible authority. Look at all of these Protestant denominations, 30,000 of them the last time I checked. How do you know you're in the correct church?" (Staples/Latar debate on sola Scriptura, Apolonio Latar, Catholic defender, 2002)
"First, it results in hermeneutical anarchy. The fact that hundreds of denominations, each professing to derive its teaching by means of the Holy Spirit's guidance from "Scripture alone," cannot agree even on the fundamentals of the faith, such as the meaning of baptism or the Lord's Supper or even the means of salvation, constitutes a powerful prima facie case against it. ... sola Scriptura has resulted in denominational factionalism. It has spawned thousands of denominations, and sects and cults and conventicles. According to the Oxford Encyclopedia of World Christianity, published in 1982, there are more than 28,000 recognizable denominations of Christianity. (Philip Blosser, Philosophical and Practical Problems with Sola Scriptura, 1998)
"The absurdity of this claim [sola Scriptura] is clearly evidenced by the multitude of conflicting interpretations that the thousands of Protestant denominations give to particular biblical passages." (THE WAY: What Every Protestant Should Know About the Orthodox Church, Clark Carlton, 1997, p 100)
Refutation of the false Roman Catholic and Orthodox argument: |
True Sola Scriptura leads to perfect unity! Oral traditions and creeds cause division!
A. Analysis of Table 1-5 to calculate the number of Roman Catholic and Orthodox denominations:
B. Assessments and comments:
C. Table 1-3 Organized Christianity: Global totals in 1995 AD
Note: Denomination is defined in Barrett's book, as an organization within a single country. This means that if the Roman Catholic church is in 234 countries, it would have a at least 234 denominations listed. Conversely, To say the Roman Catholic church has 239 denominations in 234 countries, is a conclusion that seriously misreads the data. On the other hand, the fact that there are 8848 denominations in the Protestant column, does not mean there are 8848 Protestant denominations as Catholics suggest. If you divide 8848 by the 237 countries, you come up with a figure of only actual 37 denominations in 237 countries. This calculation (8848/237 = 37) is close the real figure because table 1-5, lists 27 distinct Protestant traditions. We have taken the liberty of adding a new "sects" column below which is a more accurate picture of actual denominations.
Table 1-3 |
|||
Mega-bloc |
Denominations in 1995 |
countries |
Sects |
Roman Catholic |
239 |
234 |
22 |
Orthodox |
764 |
133 |
25 |
Protestant |
8848 |
231 |
27 |
Anglicans |
168 |
162 |
7 |
Independent |
21,582 |
220 |
209 |
Marginal |
1,488 |
215 |
15 |
Total |
33,089 |
237 |
305 |
(David A. Barrett, World Christian Encyclopedia, 2001, p 12)
22 Roman Catholic sects within Roman Catholicism under Rome's direct control: |
25 Orthodox sects within Orthodoxy direct communion with Constantinople: |
1.
Armenian (Eastern-rite Catholic) |
1.
Albanian / Greek-speaking (Orthodox) |
(Table 1-5: David A. Barrett, World Christian Encyclopedia, 2001, p 16-18) |
D. 24 Independent subgroups: 8 Roman Catholic and 16 Orthodox subgroups not in communion with their larger bodies from which they had their origin.
2
Name |
3 |
6 |
11 |
13 |
A |
Independent Anglo-Catholic RC |
100 |
14,000 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
Independent Byzantine-rite RC |
30 |
6,000 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Conservative Catholic (schism ex Rome) RC |
3,000 |
4,518.000 |
435 |
30 |
30 |
Latin-rite Catholic RC |
18,300 |
5,828,000 |
5 |
1 |
5 |
Liberal Catholic (Theosophical, Masonic, Gnostic) RC |
300 |
106,000 |
27 |
18 |
5 |
Old Believer, Old Ritualist RC |
3,300 |
1,957,000 |
25 |
19 |
10 |
Old Catholic RC |
1,100 |
886,000 |
26 |
19 |
10 |
Reformed Catholic, retaining Roman Catholic claims RC |
9,500 |
5,110,000 |
16 |
11 |
3 |
Independent Bulgarian Orthodox OR |
200 |
500,000 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Independent Estonian Orthodox OR |
10 |
9,000 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
Independent Greek Orthodox OR |
20 |
16,000 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
Independent Hungarian Orthodox OR |
1 |
1,000 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Independent Macedonian Orthodox |
3 |
1,000 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Independent Moldavian Orthodox OR |
40 |
630,000 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Independent Assyrian or Nestorian (East Syrian) OR |
100 |
74,000 |
5 |
3 |
5 |
Old Calendarist Authentic Orthodox OR |
300 |
261,000 |
8 |
4 |
5 |
schism from Orthodoxy, in Protestant direction OR |
300 |
95.000 |
28 |
6 |
20 |
Orthodox sect/sectarian OR |
900 |
139.000 |
30 |
3 |
15 |
Reformed Orthodox (uncanonical reform movement) OR |
1800 |
1,023,000 |
23 |
15 |
12 |
Independent Romanian Orthodox OR |
100 |
110,000 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
Independent Russian Orthodox OR |
700 |
921.000 |
32 |
30 |
3 |
Independent Serbian Orthodox OR |
50 |
34,000 |
5 |
5 |
1 |
True Orthodox (devoutly conservative Russian Orthodox) OR |
8,100 |
358,000 |
6 |
4 |
2 |
Independent Ukrainian Orthodox OR |
3,400 |
6,324,000 |
24 |
18 |
3 |
Totals:
24 |
51,654 |
23,253,673 |
710 |
- |
|
Estimated number of denominations for both Orthodox and Roman Catholic independent. This was calculated using rough averages but is likely reasonably accurate. Note that we also took the middle of high and low figures, meaning that we took the conservative road with the data. |
140 |
||||
(Table 1-5: David A. Barrett, World Christian Encyclopedia, 2001, p 16-18) |
E. Apples to Apples comparisons when quoting Barrett's 30,000 denominations figure:
. |
Comparison #1 |
Comparison #2 |
Comparison #3 |
. |
Denominations: |
Denominations: |
Denominations: |
Roman Catholic |
238 + 172 = 410 |
88 |
67 |
Orthodox |
764 + 538 = 1302 |
99 |
75 |
Protestant |
8848 |
27 |
27 |
Independent |
21,582 - 710 = 20,872 |
209- 24 = 185 (24 from column 2 in table 1-5) |
209- 24 = 185 (24 from column 2 in table 1-5) |
F. Baptists, Calvinists side with the Catholic traditionalists:
Inward Witness Creedalists claim using the Bible alone causes religious division: Inward Witness Creedalists are a dangerous bunch because they infect others with their self deception. On one hand they say scripture is understandable, yet they claim you cannot understand the Bible without the Holy Spirit. On one hand they criticize the Roman Catholic and Orthodox churches for keeping the Bible out of the hands of the masses, yet claim that only their own denominations got the doctrine right.
"Perhaps the best way to explain the fundamental problem with the modern Evangelical version of solo scriptura would be through the use of an illustration to which many believers may be able to relate. Almost every Christian who has wrestled with theological questions has encountered the problem of competing interpretations of Scripture. If one asks a dispensationalist pastor, for example, why he teaches premillennialism, the answer will be, "Because the Bible teaches premillennialism:' If one asks the conservative Presbyterian pastor across the street why he teaches amillennialism (or postmillennialism), the answer will likely be, "Because that is what the Bible teaches." Each man will claim that the other is in error, but by what ultimate authority do they typically make such a judgment? Each man will claim that he bases his judgment on the authority of the Bible, but since each man's interpretation is mutually exclusive of the other's, both interpretations cannot be correct. How then do we discern which interpretation is correct? The typical modern Evangelical solution to this problem is to tell the inquirer to examine the arguments on both sides and decide which of them is closest to the teaching of Scripture. He is told that this is what sola scriptura means-to individually evaluate all doctrines according to the only authority, the Scripture. Yet in reality, all that occurs is that one Christian measures the scriptural interpretations of other Christians against the standard of his own scriptural interpretation. Rather than placing the final authority in Scripture as it intends to do, this concept of Scripture places the final authority in the reason and judgment of each individual believer. The result is the relativism, subjectivism, and theological chaos that we see in modern Evangelicalism today." (The Shape Of Sola Scriptura, Keith A. Mathison, Reformed Protestant, 2001, p 239)
Conclusion:
Table "Conclusion A" |
|
Type |
Number of denominations |
Roman Catholic |
410 |
Orthodox |
1302 |
Protestant |
8848 |
Independent |
20,872 |
Table "Conclusion B" |
|
Type |
Number of denominations |
Roman Catholic |
88 |
Orthodox |
99 |
Protestant |
27 |
Independent |
185 |
Table "Conclusion C" |
|
Type |
Number of denominations |
Roman Catholic |
67 |
Orthodox |
75 |
Protestant |
27 |
Independent |
185 |
Table "Conclusion D" |
|
Type |
Number of denominations |
Roman Catholic |
30 |
Orthodox |
41 |
Protestant |
27 |
Independent |
185 |
Table "Conclusion E" |
|
Type |
Number of denominations |
Roman Catholic |
9 |
Orthodox |
17 |
Protestant |
27 |
Independent |
185 |
Table "Conclusion F" |
|
Type |
Number of denominations |
Traditionalist |
142 |
Pseudo sola Scriptura (Protestant, Reform, Baptist etc) |
27 |
Non sola Scriptura (Charismatic/ Pentecostal) |
184 |
Sola Scriptura |
1 |
.
Click here to find a congregation of this one sola Scriptura church in your own home town! |
.
.
.
More Anti-Sola Scriptura arguments refuted!
More Pro-Oral Church tradition arguments refuted!
by Steve Rudd (click to email your comments)